Abstract
Objectives
To prospectively determine the feasibility of preoperative supine breast MRI in breast cancer patients scheduled for oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery.
Methods
In addition to a diagnostic prone breast MRI, a supplementary supine MRI was performed with the patient in the surgical position including skin markers. Tumours’ locations were ink-marked on the skin according to findings obtained from supine MRI. Changes in tumours’ largest diameter and locations between prone and supine MRI were measured and compared to histology. Nipple-to-tumour and tumour-to-chest wall distances were also measured. Tumours and suspicious areas were surgically removed according to skin ink-markings. The differences between MRI measurements with reference to histopathology were evaluated with the paired-sample t test.
Results
Fourteen consecutive patients, 15 breasts and 27 lesions were analysed. Compared to histology, prone MRI overestimated tumour size by 47.1% (p = 0.01) and supine MRI by 14.5% (p = 0.259). In supine MRI, lesions’ mean diameters and areas were smaller compared to prone MRI (– 20.9%, p = 0.009 and – 38.3%, p = 0.016, respectively). This difference in diameter was more pronounced in non-mass lesions (– 31.2%, p = 0.031) compared to mass lesions (– 9.2%, p = 0.009). Tumours’ mean distance from chest wall diminished by 69.4% (p < 0.001) and from nipple by 18.2% (p < 0.001). Free microscopic margins were achieved in first operation in all patients.
Conclusions
Supine MRI in the surgical position is feasible and useful in the precise localisation of prone MRI-detected lesions and provides a helpful tool to implement in surgery. Supine MRI more accurately determines tumours’ size and location and might have an important role to diminish overestimations.
Key Points
• Breath-hold supine breast MRI is feasible using commercially available coils and sequences.
• Size and area of lesions on MRI were consistently smaller when measured from the supine position as compared to the prone position.
• Supine breast MRI is useful in the precise preoperative localisation of prone MRI-detected lesions.
•
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BCS:
-
Breast-conserving surgery
- DCIS:
-
Ductal carcinoma in situ
- IDC:
-
Invasive ductal carcinoma
- OBCS:
-
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery
- VIBE:
-
Volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination
References
Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS et al (2012) Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 13:412–419
Leithner D, Wengert GJ, Helbich TH et al (2017) Clinical role of breast MRI now and going forward. Clin Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2017.10.021
Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B et al (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 46:1296–1316
Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH (1985) Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 56:979–990
Turnbull L, Brown S, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 375:563–571
Houssami N, Turner RM, Morrow M (2017) Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 165:273–283
Tozaki M, Fukuda K (2006) Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast 15:137–140
Carbonaro LA, Tannaphai P, Trimboli RM, Verardi N, Fedeli MP, Sardanelli F (2012) Contrast enhanced breast MRI: spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results. Eur J Radiol 81:e771–e774
Siegler P, Holloway CM, Causer P, Thevathasan G, Plewes DB (2011) Supine breast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:1212–1217
Gombos EC, Jayender J, Richman DM et al (2016) Intraoperative supine breast MR imaging to quantify tumor deformation and detection of residual breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology 281:720–729
Pallone MJ, Poplack SP, Avutu HB, Paulsen KD, Barth RJ Jr (2014) Supine breast MRI and 3D optical scanning: a novel approach to improve tumor localization for breast con-serving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 21:2203–2208
Kuhl CK, Strobel K, Bieling H et al (2017) Impact of preoperative breast MR imaging and MR-guided surgery on diagnosis and surgical outcome of women with invasive breast cancer with and without DCIS component. Radiology 284:645–655
Hayes MK (2017) Update on preoperative breast localization. Radiol Clin North Am 55:591–603
Macmillan RD, James R, Gale KL, McCulley SJ (2014) Therapeutic mammaplasty. J Surg Oncol 110:90–95
Schouten van der Velden AP, Schlooz-Vries MS, Boetes C, Wobbes T (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review. Am J Surg 198:262–269
Lai HW, Chen DR, Wu YC et al (2015) Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging with sonography in the prediction of breast cancer tumor size: a concordance analysis with histopathologically determined tumor size. Ann Surg Oncol 22:3816–3823
Leddy R, Irshad A, Metcalfe A et al (2016) Comparative accuracy of preoperative tumor size assessment on mammography, sonography, and MRI: is the accuracy affected by breast density or cancer subtype? J Clin Ultrasound 44:17–25
Behjatnia B, Sim J, Bassett LW, Moatamed NA, Apple SK (2010) Does size matter? Comparison study between MRI, gross, and microscopic tumor sizes in breast cancer in lumpectomy specimens. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 3:303–309
Fancellu A, Turner RM, Dixon JM, Pinna A, Cottu P, Houssami N (2015) Meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ. Br J Surg 102:883–893
Esserman LJ, Kumar AS, Herrera AF et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 24:4603–4610
Carin AJ, Molière S, Gabriele V et al (2017) Relevance of breast MRI in determining the size and focality of invasive breast cancer treated by mastectomy: a prospective study. World J Surg Oncol 15:128-017-1197-1
Ramião NG, Martins PS, Rynkevic R, Fernandes AA, Barroso M, Santos DC (2016) Biomechanical properties of breast tissue, a state-of-the-art review. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15:1307–1323
Satake H, Ishigaki S, Kitano M, Naganawa S (2016) Prediction of prone-to-supine tumor displacement in the breast using patient position change: investigation with prone MRI and supine CT. Breast Cancer 23:149–158
Ebrahimi M, Siegler P, Modhafar A, Holloway CM, Plewes DB, Martel AL (2014) Using surface markers for MRI guided breast conserving surgery: a feasibility survey. Phys Med Biol 7:1589–1605
Conley RH, Meszoely IM, Weis JA et al (2015) Realization of a biomechanical model-assisted image guidance system for breast cancer surgery using supine MRI. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:1985–1996
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr Mazen Sudah MD, PhD.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in this study.
Ethical approval
Institutional review board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• prospective
• case-control, diagnostic study
• performed at one institution
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joukainen, S., Masarwah, A., Könönen, M. et al. Feasibility of mapping breast cancer with supine breast MRI in patients scheduled for oncoplastic surgery. Eur Radiol 29, 1435–1443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5681-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5681-y